Justin Bieber’s ‘Sorry’ Lawsuit Mentions Skrillex & Blood Diamonds As “Infringing Producers”

Justin Bieber's 'Sorry' Lawsuit Mentions Skrillex & Blood Diamonds As "Infringing Producers"

The lawsuit saga between White Hinterland and ‘Sorry’ collaborators Justin Bieber and his associates has quickly caught public eye and has shot up to make news headlines everywhere including the dance music industry. The full filing sheds light on the entire case which talks about how the Skrillex assisted single ‘Sorry’ rips off from the artist’s 2012 hit ‘Ring The Bell.’

Also, Skrillex, Blood Diamonds aka Michael TuckerJustin Bieber and his Bieber Time LLC, fellow songwriters Julia Michaels and Justin Tranter alongside fellow music publishing companies and distributors have been named in the filing.

As per the filing, the “unique vocal riff” around which the entire lawsuit is based upon, it writes:

“Plaintiff’s “Ring the Bell” opens up with the signature and unique vocal riff, which provides the introduction and primary musical motive for the structure of the song. This vocal riff – also referred to as a loop, chant, or hook – is crucial to the sound recording and composition of “Ring the Bell,” creating the backbone for the composition and the song’s initial hook. After opening the song, the vocal riff repeats throughout, serving as a unifying thread for “Ring the Bell.”

The case takes a crucial turn where even Diplo is accused due to his close friendship with Justin Bieber, Skrillex and more and is said to have been aware of White’s track ‘Ring The Bells‘ due to the label ‘Dead Oceans‘ which Wesley Pentz and the singer shared.

“Prior to the creation of the music for “Sorry,” Skrillex, Diplo, and Blood allhad access to, and upon information and belief, were familiar with Plaintiff’s “Ring the Bell” due to the widespread commercial release of “Ring the Bell,” the music press’s coverage and reviews of Plaintiff’s “Ring the Bell,” Diplo’s database of songs kept on his hard drive, Diplo’s and Plaintiff’s shared label family, and Rolling Stone
magazine’s coverage of Plaintiff and Skrillex in the same issue on two separate occasions.”

Furthermore, it also details out the similarities between the two tracks and how the pitch, notes and timings are remarkably identical.

“In scientific pitch notation, the four notes of the sampled female vocal riffof both “Ring the Bell” and the infringing “Sorry” are the same and the four pitches are of equal duration and are sung in a rapid succession by Plaintiff’s voice. The temporal spacing of the notes of the female vocal riff in both “Ring the Bell” and the infringing “Sorry” are the same.

The duration of “Sorry” is 3 minutes and 21 seconds. Defendants sample Plaintiff’s “Ring the Bell” for the first eight seconds of “Sorry,” and, then, Defendants repeat Plaintiff’s “Ring the Bell” at approximate intervals of 1:05-1:20; 1:27-1:30; 2:28-2:42; and 2:49-3:01.”

With Skrillex and Diplo having already weighed in on the case at hand, with the former having already proven on social media how the vocal riff was created and not ‘jacked’, it will be interesting to see how the court proceeds, given it calls out on the matter of intellectual property and copyright issues. Till then, stay tuned!

You can read the entire filing here.

H/T: Dancing Astronaut

About The Author

@thisguyislit

Related Posts

Leave a Reply